Nylon vs. Delrin: In‑Depth Technical Comparison for High‑Wear Applications

Molecular structure, mechanical behaviour, environmental resistance, and selection criteria for two engineering thermoplastics

Both nylon (polyamide, PA) and Delrin (acetal homopolymer, POM) are widely used in injection moulding and CNC machining. However, their differences in molecular architecture lead to significantly different performance in wear, moisture, temperature, and long‑term creep. This guide provides a technical deep dive to support material selection.

For basic property tables, refer to our Materials Comparison Guide.

Nylon

1. Molecular Structure and Crystallinity

Property Nylon (PA 6, PA 66) Delrin (POM)
Polymer type Semi‑crystalline polyamide Semi‑crystalline acetal homopolymer
Repeating unit –[NH–(CH₂)ₙ–CO]– –[CH₂–O]–
Hydrogen bonding Strong interchain H‑bonds (amide groups) No H‑bonds; polar but flexible ether linkages
Typical crystallinity 30–45% (PA 66) 60–80%
Glass transition (Tg) ~50–60°C (dry) ~ –60°C (very low)
Melting point (Tm) PA 66: ~260°C; PA 6: ~220°C ~175–180°C

Key insight: POM’s higher crystallinity and lack of moisture‑sensitive H‑bonds give it superior dimensional stability and lower creep under humidity. Nylon’s H‑bonding provides higher dry‑state strength and toughness but makes it hygroscopic.


2. Mechanical Properties: Strength, Stiffness, and Creep

Property (dry, 23°C) Nylon 66 Nylon 6 Delrin (POM)
Tensile strength (MPa) 70–85 60–75 60–70
Tensile modulus (GPa) 2.5–3.5 2.0–3.0 2.8–3.4
Elongation at break (%) 20–50 30–100 10–40
Notched Izod impact (kJ/m²) 4–8 5–12 6–9
Creep modulus (1000h, 23°C, 10 MPa) – dry ~1.5 GPa ~1.4 GPa ~2.2 GPa
Creep modulus (1000h, 23°C, 10 MPa) – wet (2.5% moisture) ~0.8 GPa ~0.7 GPa ~2.1 GPa (nearly unchanged)

Creep resistance: POM maintains stiffness under long‑term load, especially in humid environments. Nylon’s creep performance degrades significantly with moisture absorption.

Glass‑filled variants (e.g. 30% GF) increase tensile modulus to 8–12 GPa for both materials, but POM remains less moisture‑sensitive.


3. Wear and Friction Mechanisms

Property Nylon Delrin
Coefficient of friction (dry vs. steel) 0.3–0.5 0.2–0.35
Limiting PV (pressure × velocity) for unlubricated bearings (MPa·m/s) ~0.1 ~0.5–1.0
Wear rate (mm³/Nm) against steel, dry 10–30 × 10⁻⁶ 1–5 × 10⁻⁶
Abrasion resistance (Taber, CS‑17 wheel) Moderate (80–120 mg/1000 cycles) Excellent (30–50 mg/1000 cycles)

Why POM wears less: POM forms a smooth transfer film on counterfaces due to its low surface energy and highly crystalline, self‑lubricating nature. Nylon, especially when dry, can abrade more and has a higher tendency for stick‑slip.

Filled nylons (MoS₂, PTFE, or oil‑filled) can approach POM’s friction but at added cost.

For bearing design, refer to our Wear and Friction Guide.

Liquid silicone rubber 1

4. Moisture Absorption and Dimensional Stability

Property Nylon 66 Nylon 6 Delrin
Water absorption (24h immersion, 23°C) 1.2–1.5% 1.5–1.8% 0.2–0.3%
Saturation (50% RH) 2.5–3.0% 3.0–3.5% 0.2–0.4%
Saturation (immersion) 8–9% 9–10% 0.4–0.6%
Linear mould shrinkage (typical) 1.0–1.5% 0.8–1.4% 1.8–2.2% (but highly isotropic)
Dimensional change from dry to saturated +0.5–0.7% +0.6–0.8% <0.1%

Practical consequence: Nylon parts in humid environments can swell significantly, altering fit and tolerances. Delrin parts remain stable, making them preferred for precision components in wet or variable‑humidity conditions (e.g., pumps, valves, marine applications).

Pre‑conditioning nylon (moisture equilibration before use) is often required for critical assemblies.


5. Thermal Performance and Continuous Service Temperature

Property Nylon 66 Nylon 6 Delrin
Heat deflection temperature (HDT, 1.82 MPa, dry) 90–100°C 65–80°C 110–130°C
HDT (unannealed, 0.45 MPa) 200–220°C 160–180°C 155–165°C
Continuous service temperature (air, 20,000h) 80–100°C 75–90°C 90–105°C
Short‑term peak temperature 180–200°C 150–170°C 140–150°C
Thermal degradation onset (TGA, air) ~350°C ~340°C ~320°C

Nylon retains more strength at elevated temperatures (up to 150°C) than Delrin, which begins to soften noticeably above 100°C. For under‑hood automotive components or electrical connectors near heat sources, glass‑filled nylon is often preferred.

For high‑temperature continuous operation (>120°C), consider PEEK or PEI instead. [Internal Link: /materials/peek-pei/]


6. Chemical Resistance

Chemical class Nylon 66 Delrin
Aliphatic hydrocarbons (oils, greases) Good Excellent
Aromatic hydrocarbons (toluene, benzene) Moderate Good
Alcohols Good Good
Esters, ketones Poor to moderate Moderate (some attack)
Strong mineral acids Poor (attacks amide) Poor (oxidising acids degrade)
Strong bases Poor (hydrolysis) Good (except very concentrated)
Water / steam (long term) Hydrolyses above 80°C Stable (but limited to <100°C for long life)
UV resistance (unmodified) Poor (requires stabilisers) Poor (requires carbon black or UV stabilisers)

Note: Both materials degrade under UV. For outdoor applications, select UV‑stabilised grades or use black pigmentation.

Delrin

7. Compatibility with Manufacturing Processes

Process Nylon Delrin
Injection moulding Excellent – wide processing window Excellent – easy flow, low moisture sensitivity
CNC machining Good – but moisture content must be controlled to avoid warping Excellent – very stable, no moisture issues
3D printing (SLS / MJF) Yes – many powder grades available No – not available in powder form for SLS/MJF
Extrusion Good Good

For 3D printing of nylon (PA 12, PA 11, glass‑filled), see our 3D Printing Materials page [Internal Link: /services/3d-printing/materials/].


8. Long‑Term Aging and Fatigue

Property Nylon 66 (dry) Delrin
Fatigue endurance limit (10⁷ cycles, reverse bending, 23°C) 20–25 MPa 28–35 MPa
Retention after 5000h at 100°C in air 70–80% (oxidative) 85–90%
Retention after 5000h at 80°C in water 30–50% (hydrolysis) >90%
Recommended max operating temperature for 10 years 80–100°C (dry), 60–80°C (wet) 90°C (continuous)

Takeaway: Delrin has superior fatigue and long‑term stability in wet or moderate‑temperature environments. Nylon’s fatigue life is highly sensitive to moisture and temperature.


9. Cost Comparison (Indicative, 2026)

Material Relative cost per kg (standard unfilled)
Nylon 6/6 1.0 (baseline)
Nylon 6 0.9–1.0
Delrin (POM) 1.1–1.3
Glass‑filled nylon (30%) 1.2–1.4
Glass‑filled Delrin (30%) 1.5–1.8
Specialty nylons (PA 46, PPA) 2.0–3.0

Delrin is slightly more expensive than standard nylon but cheaper than high‑temperature nylons. For precision, low‑moisture applications, the added cost may be justified by longer part life and reduced maintenance.

Acetal delrin

10. Selection Decision Framework

Use the following criteria to choose between nylon and Delrin:

Choose Nylon if:

  • Part will be used dry or low humidity (or can be pre‑conditioned)
  • 3D printing is required
  • Continuous temperature exceeds 100°C (glass‑filled nylon)
  • High toughness and impact strength are critical
  • Cost is the primary driver (unfilled grades)
  • Electrical insulation in dry environments is needed

Choose Delrin if:

  • Part operates in wet, high‑humidity, or submerged conditions
  • Tight dimensional tolerances must be maintained over time
  • Low friction and high wear resistance (unlubricated bearings, gears) are essential
  • Machined parts with excellent surface finish are required
  • Creep resistance under long‑term static load is important
  • Part will be stored or used outdoors with UV‑stabilised grade

Hybrid approach: Use glass‑filled nylon for high‑temperature strength, or oil‑filled / PTFE‑filled Delrin for extreme wear applications.